Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33788052›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2021

Efficacy and safety of human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) for treatment of patients in France with sepsis-associated coagulopathy: post hoc analysis of SCARLET.

Bruno François, Maud Fiancette, Julie Helms, Emmanuelle Mercier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Toshihiko Kayanoki, Kosuke Tanaka, David Fineberg, Jean-Louis Vincent, Xavier Wittebole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Why anticoagulant studies on sepsis fail frequently --- start with SCARLET.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Bruno FrançoisICU Department, Inserm CIC-1435 & UMR-1092, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP, CHU Dupuytren, 2 Av Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges, France. bruno.francois@chu-limoges.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1652
Maud FiancetteService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Julie HelmsFaculté de Médecine, Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Strasbourg, France.
Emmanuelle MercierMédecine Intensive Réanimation, CRICS-TRIGGERSEP, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Toshihiko KayanokiDepartment of Program Management & Scientific Affairs, Asahi Kasei Pharma America Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA.
Kosuke TanakaDepartment of Program Management & Scientific Affairs, Asahi Kasei Pharma America Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA.
David FinebergDepartment of Medical Affairs, Asahi Kasei Pharma America Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier WitteboleDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinique Universitaire St Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Asahi Kasei (United States) · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRInserm · FRRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phase 3 multinational SCARLET study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) for treatment of sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC), which correlates with increased mortality risk in patients with sepsis. Although no significant reduction in mortality was observed with ART-123 compared with placebo in the full analysis set (FAS), an efficacy signal of ART-123 was observed in subgroups of patients who sustained coagulopathy until the first treatment and those not administered concomitant heparin. Post hoc analysis was performed of patients treated in France, the country with the largest enrollment (19% of the FAS) and consistent patient enrollment throughout the study duration.

methodsAdult patients with SAC (international normalized ratio > 1.4; platelets > 30 × 10

resultsBaseline characteristics were similar between France and the ROW, but some measurements of disease severity were higher in patients in France. The 28-day all-cause mortality absolute risk reductions (ARRs) with ART-123 were 8.3% in France and 1.1% in the ROW. The greater ARR in France may be related to a higher rate of sustained coagulopathy and lower rate of heparin use. In France and the ROW, 84.6% and 78.0% of patients sustained coagulopathy from the time of initial SAC diagnosis to first treatment with the study drug, and 65.8% and 43.9% did not receive heparin, respectively. The ARRs for these subgroups of patients in France were 13.4% and 16.6%, respectively. Safety of ART-123 was comparable between France and the ROW.

conclusionsResults from this exploratory analysis suggest that patients with sustained SAC not receiving concomitant heparin may benefit from ART-123, a fact that should be confirmed in future studies with more restrictive inclusion criteria.

Indexed as

ART-123FranceHeparinSepsisSepsis-associated coagulopathyThrombomodulin

Identifiers

PMID33788052
PMCPMC8012451
OpenAlexW3150700027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.