ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022
Urethral support in female urinary continence part 2: a computational, biomechanical analysis of Valsalva.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urethral Morphology and Support Associated with Urinary Symptoms after Vaginal Surgery with and without Midurethral Sling.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Finite element modeling in obstetrics and gynecology: advances, applications, and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Understanding female urinary continence-lessons from complications of female urethral surgery.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- A systematic comparison between FEBio and PolyFEM for biomechanical systems.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024Article
- The Anatomical Pathogenesis of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisIn Part 1, we observed urethral mechanics during Valsalva that oppose current continence theories. In this study, we utilize a finite element model to elucidate the role of supportive tissues on the urethra during Valsalva. By determining the sensitivity of urethral motion and deformations to variations in tissue stiffnesses, we formulate new hypotheses regarding mechanisms of urethral passive closure.
methodsAnatomy was segmented from a nulliparous, continent woman at rest. The model was tuned such that urethral motion during Valsalva matched that observed in that patient. Urethra and surrounding tissue material properties were varied using Latin hypercube sampling to perform a sensitivity analysis. As in Part 1, urethral length, proximal and distal swinging, and shape parameters were measured at peak Valsalva for 50 simulations, and partial rank correlation coefficients were calculated between all model inputs and outputs. Cumulative influence factors determined which tissue properties were meaningfully influential (≥ 0.5).
resultsThe material properties of the urethra, perineal membrane, bladder, and paraurethral connective tissues meaningfully influenced urethral motion, deformation, and shape. Reduction of the urethral stiffness and/or the perineal membrane soft constraint resulted in simulated urethral motions and shapes associated with stress urinary incontinence in Part 1.
conclusionsThe data from Parts 1 and 2 suggest that connective tissues guide the controlled swinging motion and deformation of the urethra needed for passive closure during Valsalva. The swinging and kinking quantified in Part 1 and simulated in Part 2 are inconsistent with current continence theories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.