Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33787926›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Efficacy of telehealth acceptance and commitment therapy for weight loss: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Jonathan B Bricker, Kristin E Mull, Brianna M Sullivan, Evan M Forman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06292936 (Evaluation of a Remotely-Delivered Behavioral Intervention for Post-Bariatric Surgery Weight Regain), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06292936 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Remotely-Delivered Behavioral Intervention for Post-Bariatric Surgery Weight Regain

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsObesity, Bariatric Surgery CandidateArmsAcceptance-Based Behavioral Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan B BrickerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-8795
Kristin E MullDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-3078
Brianna M SullivanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-780X
Evan M FormanDepartment of Psychology, and Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-1384
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USDrexel University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Telephone Delivered Acceptance & Commitment Therapy for Weight LossR01DK124114 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRICKER, JONATHAN B · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth coaching for weight loss has high population-level reach but limited efficacy. To potentially improve on this limitation, the purpose of this study was to determine the preliminary efficacy of the first known telephone coaching acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for weight loss. A two-arm, stratified, individually randomized pilot trial comparing ACT (n = 53) with standard behavioral therapy (SBT; n = 52) was used for this study. Both interventions were delivered in 25 telephone coaching calls (15-20 min each) over a 12 month period. Weight was measured at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 month postrandomization follow-ups. Recruited from 32 U.S. states, participants were of mean age 40.7, 42% male, 34% racial/ethnic minority, and mean baseline body mass index of 34.3. Fractions of 10% or more scale-reported weight loss: 15% for ACT versus 4% for SBT at 3 month follow-up (N = 86; odds ratio [OR] = 4.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79, 26.83), 24% for ACT versus 13% for SBT at 6 month follow-up (N = 72; OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 0.65, 9.23), 30% for ACT versus 30% for SBT at 12 month follow-up (N = 57; OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.28, 3.09). Fractions of 10% or more self-reported weight loss at 12 month follow-up: 25% for ACT versus 15% for SBT (N = 75; OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 0.68, 8.34). The conclusion of the study was the preliminary evidence that telephone coaching ACT may be efficacious for weight loss.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyTelemedicineAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsPilot ProjectsTelephoneWeight LossAcceptance and commitment therapyObesityTelehealthTelephoneWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID33787926
PMCPMC8604276
OpenAlexW3144656948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.