Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33787841›Full record

ReviewJAMA surgery2021

Clinical Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Review.

Michail N Mavros, Dimitrios Moris, Paul J Karanicolas, Matthew H G Katz, Eileen M O'Reilly, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanoparticles Bounded to Interfering RNAs as a Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteomics in pancreatic cancer.Biomarker research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michail N MavrosDepartment of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Dimitrios MorisDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Paul J KaranicolasDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Eileen M O'ReillyDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Cornell University · USDuke Medical Center · USOffice of Multidisciplinary Activities · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on level 1 evidence, but some studies suggest that a neoadjuvant approach (which is standard for borderline resectable PDAC) may be preferable for upfront resectable PDAC. An in-depth review was conducted of all randomized clinical trials that investigated neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of patients with resectable or resected PDAC, focusing on trial design, characteristics of enrolled population, and long-term outcomes. Observations: The existing resectable PDAC trials have good internal validity but variable applicability because of their restrictive eligibility criteria. In these trials, overall survival is the criterion standard end point, but disease-free survival is more feasible, proximate, and specific to the assigned intervention (at the cost of subjective outcome assessment) and thus an acceptable end point in certain contexts. The prolonged survival in the PRODIGE 24 trial highlights both the success of mFOLFIRINOX (modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and the importance of patient selection. Neoadjuvant and perioperative trials have shown promising preliminary results; however, the number of patients who are not subsequently eligible for surgery reflects the limitations of this approach. Head-to-head comparisons of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments are limited to date in Western countries. Precision oncology with genomic and somatic testing for actionable mutations has promising preliminary results and may refine the management of PDAC, although the implications for early-stage disease and neoadjuvant therapy are unknown. Conclusions and Relevance: This review found that adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX is currently the standard of care in fit patients with resected PDAC; however, the role of neoadjuvant treatment is expanding. Precision oncology may help individualize the treatment regimen and sequence and improve outcomes. Enrollment of patients with resectable PDAC in clinical trials is strongly encouraged.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinNeoadjuvant TherapyOxaliplatinPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsFluorouracilfolfirinoxIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID33787841
OpenAlexW3150293984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.