SynthesisMedicine2021
Evaluation of astragaloside IV in hepatic fibrosis: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Astragaloside IV in type 2 diabetic vascular complications: from traditional mechanisms to an emerging epitranscriptomic (m6A) perspective.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of MTA3 in cancer and related diseases and its clinical applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Modulation of the vitamin D receptor by traditional Chinese medicines and bioactive compounds: potential therapeutic applications in VDR-dependent diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractTo evaluate the effect of astragaloside IV for hepatic fibrosis.The multiple databases like Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and China National Knowledge database were used to search for the relevant studies, and full-text articles involved in the evaluation on effect of astragaloside IV for hepatic fibrosis. Review Manager 5.2 was adopted to estimate the effects of the results among selected articles. Forest plots, sensitivity analysis and bias analysis for the articles included were also conducted.Finally, 7 eligible studies were eventually satisfied the included criteria. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in model was higher than astragaloside group (mean difference [MD] = -58.01, 95% confidential interval (CI) [-93.97, -22.05], P = .002; I2 = 99%). The meta-analysis suggested that aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in model group was more than that in astragaloside group (MD = -39.94, 95% CI [-129.38, 49.50], P = .38; I2 = 100%). Model group had higher α - smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) than astragaloside group (MD was -1.13, P of heterogeneity <.0001, I2 = 94%, Z = 5.18, P of over effect <.0001). Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) in model group was higher than that in astragaloside group (MD was -0.55, P of heterogeneity <.00001, I2 = 97%, Z = 2.54, P of over effect = .01). Limited publication bias was observed in this study.Astragaloside IV is a potential clinical drug for the treatment of liver fibrosis considering liver function and hepatic fibrosis related protein factor in experimental rats are improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.