Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786999›Full record

Observational studyClinical and translational science2021

Diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a biomarker and EMR-based machine learning algorithm for sepsis.

Ishan Taneja, Gregory L Damhorst, Carlos Lopez-Espina, Sihai Dave Zhao, Ruoqing Zhu, Shah Khan, Karen White, James Kumar, Andrew Vincent, Leon Yeh and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ishan TanejaPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gregory L DamhorstPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-1713
Carlos Lopez-EspinaPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sihai Dave ZhaoDepartment of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Ruoqing ZhuDepartment of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Shah KhanPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Karen WhiteBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
James KumarBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Andrew VincentOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Leon YehOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Shirin MajdizadehBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
William WeirBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Scott IsbellDepartment of Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
James SkinnerBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Manubolo DevanandBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Syed AzharuddinBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Rajamurugan MeenakshisundaramBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Riddhi UpadhyayBiomedical Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Anwaruddin SyedOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Thomas BaumanOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Joseph DevitoOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Charles HeinzmannOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Gregory PodolejOSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Lanxin ShenPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sanjay Sharma TimilsinaPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lucas QuinlanPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Setareh ManafirasiPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Enrique ValeraDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1359-6619
Bobby ReddyPrenosis Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rashid BashirDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Carle Foundation Hospital · USOSF Saint Francis Medical Center · USPrenosis (United States) · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USEmory University · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality among hospitalized patients worldwide. Shorter time to administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is associated with improved outcomes, but early recognition of sepsis remains a major challenge. In a two-center cohort study with prospective sample collection from 1400 adult patients in emergency departments suspected of sepsis, we sought to determine the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a machine-learning algorithm based on clinical data and a set of uncommonly measured biomarkers. Specifically, we demonstrate that a machine-learning model developed using this dataset outputs a score with not only diagnostic capability but also prognostic power with respect to hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and 3-day inpatient re-admission both in our entire testing cohort and various subpopulations. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for diagnosis of sepsis was 0.83. Predicted risk scores for patients with septic shock were higher compared with patients with sepsis but without shock (p < 0.0001). Scores for patients with infection and organ dysfunction were higher compared with those without either condition (p < 0.0001). Stratification based on predicted scores of the patients into low, medium, and high-risk groups showed significant differences in LOS (p < 0.0001), 30-day mortality (p < 0.0001), and 30-day inpatient readmission (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, a machine-learning algorithm based on electronic medical record (EMR) data and three nonroutinely measured biomarkers demonstrated good diagnostic and prognostic capability at the time of initial blood culture.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisMachine LearningAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkersElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33786999
PMCPMC8301583
OpenAlexW3149782091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.