ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2021
Validation of measurement scores for evaluating vascular anomaly skin lesions.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Upper Vascular Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Case Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular anomalies comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders caused by abnormal proliferation or development of vascular and/or lymphatic vessels. Vascular anomalies present with various symptoms and complications, but no standardized methods evaluate their severity, and to measure treatment outcomes is difficult. To assess the responsiveness of measurement scores for evaluating vascular anomaly skin lesions, we conducted a validation study to compare these measurement scores with patients' objective data. In this study, data were collected from treated and untreated patients. Skin lesions were photographed at baseline and after a follow-up period of 3-6 months. The volume of skin lesions, the degree of red or purple coloration, and color tone were measured objectively. Two external dermatologists evaluated patients' photographs and determined scores, which represented criteria for improvements in skin lesions (size and color) and 6-point Physician Global Assessment scores. The correlation between these scores and patients' objective data (lesion volume and color) was assessed to validate the scores. Twenty-three cases of vascular anomaly (seven vascular tumors, five lymphatic malformations, three venous malformations, and eight lymphatic-venous malformations) were examined. Scores for improvements in vascular anomaly skin lesions (size and color) correlated with a change in lesion volume, the degree of red or purple coloration, color tone score, and 6-point Physician Global Assessment score. Our findings suggest that these measurement scores are responsive to changes in vascular anomaly skin lesions after observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.