Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786788›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

DNA Damage Response in Xenopus laevis Cell-Free Extracts.

Tomas Aparicio Casado, Jean Gautier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomas Aparicio CasadoInstitute for Cancer Genetics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Jean GautierInstitute for Cancer Genetics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA. jg130@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

The Role of CTIP in Lymphocyte Development and LymphomagenesisP01CA174653 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RABADAN, RAUL · 2014 to 2024
$17.6M
DNA Repair and Genomic Instability in Cancer Development and TherapyR35CA197606 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GAUTIER, JEAN · 2015 to 2021
$5.7M
Multiscale proteomics studies of DNA repair and genomic stabilityR50CA233182 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI APARICIO CASADO, TOMAS · 2018 to 2022
$812k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA174653NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197606NCI NIH HHS R50 CA233182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a coordinated cellular response to a variety of insults to the genome. DDR initiates the activation of cell cycle checkpoints preventing the propagation of damaged DNA followed by DNA repair, which are both critical in maintaining genome integrity. Several model systems have been developed to study the mechanisms and complexity of checkpoint function. Here we describe the application of cell-free extracts derived from Xenopus eggs as a model system to investigate signaling from DNA damage, modulation of DNA replication, checkpoint activation, and ultimately DNA repair. We outline the preparation of cell-free extracts, DNA substrates, and their subsequent use in assays aimed at understanding the cellular response to DNA damage. Cell-free extracts derived from the eggs of Xenopus laevis remain a robust and versatile system to decipher the biochemical steps underlying this essential characteristic of all cells, critical for genome stability.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsCell CycleCell FractionationCell-Free SystemChemical FractionationChromatinDNAFemaleImmunoprecipitationMaleOocytesSpermatozoaXenopus laevisChromatinDNAChromatinDNA damage responseDNA repairDNA replicationS-phaseXenopus cell-free extracts

Identifiers

PMID33786788
PMCPMC8525667
OpenAlexW3152005845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.