Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786774›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2022

Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT).

Alice Le Bonniec, Mathieu Gourlan, Marie Préau, Florence Cousson-Gélie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice Le BonniecEpsylon (EA4556), Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France. le.bonniec.a@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9916-8038
Mathieu GourlanEpsylon (EA4556), Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marie PréauResearch Group in Social Psychology (GRePS, EA4163), University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Florence Cousson-GélieEpsylon (EA4556), Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer doctoral fellowship « Human and social sciences, Epidemiology, Public health and cancerIntegrated Site in Cancer Research of Montpellier Grant « Inca-DGOS-INSERM 6045Ligue Contre le Cancer doctoral fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost of the individuals concerned by colorectal cancer screening recognize the importance of screening participation. However, the screening rates for this cancer remain low in most countries, including France. Based on the action control framework, the present study aimed to (i) explore the distribution of intentions-behavior profiles toward colorectal cancer screening and (ii) to determine to what extent the profiles could be differentiated on theory of planned behavior (TPB) (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control [PBC]) and self-regulation variables (i.e., action planning, coping planning).

methodA total of 149 participants from the general French population (M = 60 years, SD = 7.04) completed a questionnaire measuring TPB and self-regulation variables. Subsequent screening behavior was determined from medical records. Participants were notably categorized as non-intenders, unsuccessful intenders, or successful intenders. Data were analyzed using discriminant function analysis and analyses of covariance.

resultsMain findings revealed that 71% of the intenders were unsuccessful intenders. TPB and self-regulation variables were significantly correlated with the discriminant function (rs ≥ .40). Successful and unsuccessful intenders reported significantly higher levels of subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning than non-intenders (ps < .01). Successful intenders reported a significantly higher level of coping planning than unsuccessful intenders (p < .01).

conclusionsFurther research appears necessary to empirically test to what extent interventions targeting subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning could enhance the proportion of successful intenders toward colorectal cancer screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAttitudeHumansIntentionPsychological TheorySurveys and QuestionnairesColorectal cancerIntention-behavior gapPlanningScreeningTheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.