Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786754›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2021

Drug Survival of IL-12/23, IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis Treatment: A Retrospective Multi-Country, Multicentric Cohort Study.

Tiago Torres, Luis Puig, Ron Vender, Charles Lynde, Stefano Piaserico, Jose M Carrascosa, Paolo Gisondi, Esteban Daudén, Curdin Conrad, Pedro Mendes-Bastos and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 17 institutions in 7 countries.

Tiago TorresDepartment of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal. torres.tiago@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-0870
Luis PuigDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Ron VenderMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Charles LyndeLynde Institute for Dermatology, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Stefano PiasericoDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Jose M CarrascosaDepartment of Dermatology, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital (HUGTP), Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Badalona, Spain.
Paolo GisondiSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Esteban DaudénDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.
Curdin ConradDepartment of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pedro Mendes-BastosHospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paulo FerreiraHospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luiz LeiteClínica Médica Belém, Lisbon, Portugal.
Justin D LuMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J ValerioClínica Médica Belém, Lisbon, Portugal.
M BruniSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37126, Verona, Italy.
F MessinaDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128, Padua, Italy.
A NideggerDepartment of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
M Llamas-VelascoDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.
E Del AlcazarDepartment of Dermatology, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital (HUGTP), Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Badalona, Spain.
A MuftiDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Kyra WhiteLynde Institute for Dermatology, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
G CaldarolaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Laetitia TeixeiraCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Porto, Portugal.
Paolo RomanelliDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
K DesaiDr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Spyridon GkalpakiotisDepartment of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marco RomanelliDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Jensen YeungDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Miguel NogueiraDepartment of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andrea ChiricozziFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Hospital do Desterro · PTHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESLynde Centre for Dermatology · CAUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Verona · ITCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTCharles University · CZHamilton Health Sciences · CAHospital de Sant Pau · ESMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug survival analysis of biologic agents in psoriasis is of extreme importance, as it allows not only the evaluation of objective clinical outcomes (such as effectiveness and safety) but also of factors that are associated with patients' adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the drug survival of the most recent biologic agents approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis-ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab-and to identify clinical predictors that can influence the drug survival of these drugs.

methodsThis retrospective multicentric cohort study from 16 dermatology centers in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Canada, and the United States included patients that started IL-12/23, IL-17 (IL-17A and IL-17R) and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019. Survival analysis was performed using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, to obtain descriptive survival curves, and proportional hazard Cox regression models.

resultsA total of 3312 treatment courses (total patients: 3145) were included in the study; 1118 (33.8%) with an IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), 1678 (50.7%) with an IL-17 inhibitor [911 (27.5%) on secukinumab, 651 (19.7%) on ixekizumab, 116 (3.5%) on brodalumab], and 516 (15.5%) with an IL-23 inhibitor [398 (12.0%) on guselkumab, 118 (3.5%) on risankizumab]. At 18 months, the cumulative probability of survival was 96.4% for risankizumab, 91.1% for guselkumab, 86.3% for brodalumab, 86.1% for ustekinumab, 82.0% for ixekizumab, and 79.9% for secukinumab. Using ustekinumab as reference, drug survival of guselkumab was higher (HR 0.609; 95% CI 0.418-0.887) and that of secukinumab was lower (HR 1.490; 95% CI 1.257-1.766). In the final multivariable model, secukinumab, female sex, higher BMI, and prior exposure to biologic agents significantly increased the risk of drug discontinuation, whereas risankizumab was protective.

conclusionIn this multinational cohort with 8439 patient-years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of drug survival for all drugs was >79% at 18 months. Prescribed biologic, female sex, higher BMI, and previous exposure to biologic agents were predictors of drug discontinuation. Drug survival of guselkumab and risankizumab was higher than that of ustekinumab, and secukinumab was lower.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterleukin-12Interleukin-17Interleukin-23MaleMiddle AgedPsoriasisRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBiological ProductsDermatologic AgentsInterleukin-12Interleukin-17Interleukin-23

Identifiers

PMID33786754
OpenAlexW3143775625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.