ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021
Forecasting early onset diminished ovarian reserve for young reproductive age women.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Acupuncture for Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Nomogram to predict the probability of clinical pregnancy in women with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Understanding the Mechanisms of Diminished Ovarian Reserve: Insights from Genetic Variants and Regulatory Factors.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Review
- A nomogram model to predict the high risk of lower live birth probability in young women undergoing the first IVF-ET cycle: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the biological networks associated with DOR in young women and the subsequent molecular impact on preimplantation embryos.
methodsWhole peripheral blood was collected from patients: young women presenting with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and age-matched young women with normal ovarian reserve. Maternal exome sequencing was performed on the NovaSEQ 6000 and sequencing validation was completed using Taqman® SNP Genotyping Assays. Blastocyst global methylome and transcriptome sequencing were also analyzed.
resultsExome sequencing revealed 730 significant DNA variants observed exclusively in the young DOR patients. Bioinformatic analysis revealed a significant impact to the Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling pathway and each young DOR female had an average of 6.2 deleterious DNA variants within this pathway. Additional stratification based on patient age resulted in a cut-off at 31 years for young DOR discrimination. Embryonic global methylome sequencing resulted in only a very small number of total CpG sites with methylation alterations (1,775; 0.015% of total) in the DOR group. Additionally, there was no co-localization between these limited number of altered CpG sites and significant variants, genes, or pathways. RNA sequencing also resulted in no biologically significant transcription changes between DOR blastocysts and controls.
conclusionGR signaling DNA variants were observed in women with early-onset DOR potentially compromising oocyte production and quality. However, no significant downstream effects on biological processes appear to impact the resulting blastocyst. The ability to forecast premature DOR for young women may allow for earlier identification and clinical intervention for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.