Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786717›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2021

Rapid Behavioral Health Assessment Post-disaster: Developing and Validating a Brief, Structured Module.

Emily Goldmann, David M Abramson, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Amila Samarabandu, Valerie Goodson, Alejandro Azofeifa, Abby Hagemeyer, Nadia Al-Amin, Rob Lyerla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily GoldmannSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA. esg236@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-8738
David M AbramsonSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Rachael Piltch-LoebSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Amila SamarabanduSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Valerie GoodsonCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alejandro AzofeifaWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Abby HagemeyerCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program, Atlanta, GA, USA, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nadia Al-AminCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program, Atlanta, GA, USA, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rob LyerlaWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS 1U38OT0000143-05OSTLTS CDC HHS U38 OT000143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and validate a brief, structured, behavioral health module for use by local public health practitioners to rapidly assess behavioral health needs in disaster settings. Data were collected through in-person, telephone, and web-based interviews of 101 individuals affected by Hurricanes Katrina (n = 44) and Sandy (n = 57) in New Orleans and New Jersey in April and May 2018, respectively. Questions included in the core module were selected based on convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability across administration modes, principal component analysis (PCA), question comprehension, efficiency, accessibility, and use in population-based surveys. Almost all scales showed excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha, 0.79-0.92), convergent validity (r > 0.61), and test-retest reliability (in-person vs. telephone, intra-class coefficient, ICC, 0.75-1.00; in-person vs. web-based ICC, 0.73-0.97). PCA of the behavioral health scales yielded two components to include in the module-mental health and substance use. The core module has 26 questions-including self-reported general health (1 question); symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety (Primary Care PTSD Screen, Patient Health Questionnaire-4; 8 questions); drinking and other substance use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise, AUDIT-C; Drug Abuse Screening Test, DAST-10; stand-alone question regarding increased substance use since disaster; 14 questions); prior mental health conditions, treatment, and treatment disruption (3 questions)-and can be administered in 5-10 minutes through any mode. This flexible module allows practitioners to quickly evaluate behavioral health needs, effectively allocate resources, and appropriately target interventions to help promote recovery of disaster-affected communities.

Indexed as

AlcoholismDisastersStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansMental HealthPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentBehavioral healthDisastersValidation

Identifiers

PMID33786717
PMCPMC8009271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.