Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786695›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2022

Overestimation of grey matter atrophy in glioblastoma patients following radio(chemo)therapy.

A Gommlich, F Raschke, J Petr, A Seidlitz, C Jentsch, I Platzek, J van den Hoff, J Kotzerke, B Beuthien-Baumann, M Baumann and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Elucidation of Factors Affecting the Age-Dependent Cancer Occurrence Rates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Volumetric brain assessment of long-term head and neck cancer survivors.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A Gommlich *Siemens Energy Austria GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
F RaschkeHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany. felix.raschke@oncoray.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-9609
J Petr *Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
A SeidlitzOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
C JentschOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
I PlatzekFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J van den HoffHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.
J KotzerkeFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
B Beuthien-BaumannDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
M BaumannOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
M KrauseHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
E G C TroostHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBrain atrophy has the potential to become a biomarker for severity of radiation-induced side-effects. Particularly brain tumour patients can show great MRI signal changes over time caused by e.g. oedema, tumour progress or necrosis. The goal of this study was to investigate if such changes affect the segmentation accuracy of normal appearing brain and thus influence longitudinal volumetric measurements. MATERIALS AND

methodsT1-weighted MR images of 52 glioblastoma patients with unilateral tumours acquired before and three months after the end of radio(chemo)therapy were analysed. GM and WM volumes in the contralateral hemisphere were compared between segmenting the whole brain (full) and the contralateral hemisphere only (cl) with SPM and FSL. Relative GM and WM volumes were compared using paired t tests and correlated with the corresponding mean dose in GM and WM, respectively.

resultsMean GM atrophy was significantly higher for full segmentation compared to cl segmentation when using SPM (mean ± std: ΔV

conclusionsFor accurate normal tissue volume measurements in brain tumour patients using SPM, abnormal tissue needs to be masked prior to segmentation, however, this is not necessary when using FSL.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaWhite MatterAtrophyBrainGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAtrophyGlioblastomaProtonRadiotherapySPMTissue segmentation

Identifiers

PMID33786695
PMCPMC8901471
OpenAlexW3147461816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.