Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786648›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2021

Effect of propolis mouth rinse on oral microorganisms - a randomized controlled trial.

Salil Bapat, Ramesh Nagarajappa, Gayathri Ramesh, Kruti Bapat

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Herbal medicines to prevent dental caries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Correlations of Salivary and Blood Glucose Levels among Six Saliva Collection Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Complex Extracts ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Salil BapatDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SMBT Dental College, Ghulewadi (Amrutnagar), Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
Ramesh NagarajappaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India. rameshpcd@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-7720
Gayathri RameshDepartment of Dentistry, Chamarajanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Kasaba Hobli, Yedapura, Chamarajanagar, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-2339
Kruti BapatDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, SMBT Dental College, Ghulewadi (Amrutnagar), Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INManubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital · INSiksha O Anusandhan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of prepared propolis mouth rinse with Chlorhexidine mouthwash on oral pathogens and also the plaque and gingival index scores. MATERIAL AND

methodsA triple-blind, concurrent parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 participants randomized to 4 mouth rinse study groups: (1) Hot Ethanolic Propolis extract; (2) Cold Ethanolic Propolis extract; (3) Chlorhexidine and (4) Distilled water. After a washout period of two weeks, oral prophylaxis and polishing was performed. Participants rinsed twice a day for 3 months. Saliva was collected at baseline, 5 min and 1 h for microbiological analysis. Plaque and Gingival index were recorded at baseline, 15 days, 1 month and 3 months. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultsA decline in the concentration of S. mutans was observed in samples collected after the use of mouth rinse (p < 0.05). In comparison with baseline, L. acidophilus and S. mutans count decreased simultaneously when exposed to Hot Ethanolic mouthwash group (5.5 × 10

conclusionPropolis was found to be as efficient as Chlorhexidine in reducing plaque, gingivitis and dental caries pathogens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Common microorganisms implicated in oral disease are S. mutans and L. acidophilus. There is great paucity of information on antimicrobial activity of propolis, against these microorganisms. Hence, the present study has been taken up to assess the effects of propolis on these oral pathogens.The effects of propolis on oral health have been proved which is obviously a new finding of significance.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalDental CariesDental PlaqueGingivitisPropolisChlorhexidineHumansMouthwashesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineMouthwashesPropolisDental cariesDental plaqueMouth rinsePropolis

Identifiers

PMID33786648
OpenAlexW3149432310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.