Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786572›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2021

Nutritional Assessment in Older Adults : MNA® 25 years of a Screening Tool and a Reference Standard for Care and Research; What Next?

Y Guigoz, B Vellas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06974006 (Integrated Monitoring for Independent Living in Rural Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974006 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Integrated Monitoring for Independent Living in Rural Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean University Miguel de CervantesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsAged 60 Years or OlderArmsDevices: Kardia Mobile 6L, Omron M7 BP, Beurer PO30, Datospir Peak-10, NUTRILAB BIA 101 BIVA® PRO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. GLIM consensus approach to diagnosis of malnutrition: A 5-year update.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y GuigozYves Guigoz, Chemin du Raidillon, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. yves.guigoz@gmail.com.
B Vellas
Inserm · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tool to assess nutritional status in older persons was really needed. It took 5 years to design the MNA® (Mini Nutrition Assessment) tool, complete the first validations studies both in Europe and in the U.S. and to publish it. After the full MNA®, the MNA® short form and the self-MNA® have been validated. As well as Chinese and other national MNA® forms. Now more than 2000 clinical research have used the MNA® all over the world from community care to hospital. At least 22 Expert groups included the MNA® in new clinical practice guidelines, national or international registries. The MNA® is presently included in almost all geriatric and nutrition textbook and part of the teaching program for medicine and other health care professional worldwide. The urgent need is to target the frail older adults more likely to have weight loss and poor appetite and to prevent frailty and weight loss in the robust. We present in this paper the review of 25 years of clinical research and practice using the MNA® worldwide.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansMaleMass ScreeningReference StandardsTime FactorsagingMNANutrition

Identifiers

PMID33786572
PMCPMC12876745
OpenAlexW3132512586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.