Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786440›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2021

New Decade, Old Debate: Blocking the Cytokine Pathways in Infection-Induced Cytokine Cascade.

Mahrukh S Rizvi, Alice Gallo De Moraes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CTLA-4 expression on CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in older adult critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Roles of the gut microbiota in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cytokine & growth factor reviews · 2022
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahrukh S RizviDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Alice Gallo De MoraesDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur understanding of the immunopathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 is evolving; however, a "cytokine storm" has been implicated. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the value of anticytokine therapies to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019. This review summarizes the existing literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticytokine therapy to tackle the dysregulated immune response to infectious pathogens, discusses potential reasons for failure, applicability to coronavirus disease 2019, and future direction. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and media reports. STUDY SELECTION: The studies were included by author consensus. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were selected for inclusion after reviewing each study by author consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: "Cytokine storm" is a nonspecific term, encompassing systemic inflammatory response to infectious pathogens, autoimmune conditions, cancers, trauma, and various chemotherapies. Like bacterial sepsis, viral pathogens may fuel immunopathogenesis by inducing a dysregulated autoamplifying cytokine cascade, ultimately leading to organ injury. This narrative review discusses what we know of the immune milieu of coronavirus disease 2019 versus noncoronavirus disease 2019 sepsis and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome, summarizes the existing literature on cytokine inhibitors in patients with sepsis and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome, and discusses possible reasons for recurrent failure. In doing so, it aims to assist decisions regarding the use of anticytokine therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019, as many regions of the world confront the second wave of the pandemic.

conclusionsAs ongoing clinical trials determine the efficacy and safety of anticytokine therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019, clinicians should uphold caution when incorporating it into treatment protocols, while maintaining focus on established evidence-based practices and the mantra of "less is more."

Indexed as

coronavirus disease 2019cytokine inhibitioncytokine stormsepsistocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID33786440
PMCPMC7994048
OpenAlexW3138470715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.