Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786430›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2021

Progress and Pitfalls of Bacteriophage Therapy in Critical Care: A Concise Definitive Review.

Luca Valente, Josef Prazak, Yok-Ai Que, David R Cameron

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Safety and Tolerability of ShigActive™, aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Discovery of the First LyticPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Infection and Burn Injury.European burn journal · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Treating bacterial infections with bacteriophages in the 21st century.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca ValenteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Josef PrazakDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yok-Ai QueDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
David R CameronDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBacterial infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens are a major problem for patients requiring critical care. An approach to combat resistance is the use of bacterial viruses known as "phage therapy." This review provides a brief "clinicians guide" to phage biology and discusses recent applications in the context of common infections encountered in ICUs. DATA SOURCES: Research articles were sourced from PubMed using search term combinations of "bacteriophages" or "phage therapy" with either "lung," "pneumonia," "bloodstream," "abdominal," "urinary tract," or "burn wound." STUDY SELECTION: Preclinical trials using animal models, case studies detailing compassionate use of phage therapy in humans, and randomized controlled trials were included. DATA EXTRACTION: We systematically extracted: 1) the infection setting, 2) the causative bacterial pathogen and its antibiotic resistance profile, 3) the nature of the phage therapeutic and how it was administered, 4) outcomes of the therapy, and 5) adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Phage therapy for the treatment of experimental infections in animal models and in cases of compassionate use in humans has been associated with largely positive outcomes. These findings, however, have failed to translate into positive patient outcomes in the limited number of randomized controlled trails that have been performed to date.

conclusionsWidespread clinical implementation of phage therapy depends on success in randomized controlled trials. Additional translational and reverse translational studies aimed at overcoming phage resistance, exploiting phage-antibiotic synergies, and optimizing phage administration will likely improve the design and outcome of future trials.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancenosocomial infectionsphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID33786430
PMCPMC7994034
OpenAlexW3133767440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.