Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786424›Full record

ArticleNanotechnology and Precision Engineering2020

Insight into the effects of electrochemical factors on host-guest interaction induced signature events in a biological nanopore.

Xiaojun Wei, Zehui Zhang, Xiaoqin Wang, Brian Lenhart, Roberto Gambarini, Jonathan Gray, Chang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Droplet Digital CRISPR for Nucleic Acid Detection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaojun WeiBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Zehui ZhangBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Xiaoqin WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Brian LenhartDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Roberto GambariniBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Jonathan GrayBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Chang LiuBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Funding

A Solid-State Nanopore Biosensor for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigens in Pediatric Blood SamplesK22AI136686 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI LIU, CHANG · 2019 to 2020
$265k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI136686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The signature events caused by host-guest interactions in the nanopore system can be used as a novel and characteristic signal in quantitative detection and analysis of various molecules. However, the effect of several electrochemical factors on the host-guest interactions in nanopore still remains unknown. Here, we systematically studied host-guest interactions, especially oscillation of DNA-azide adamantane@cucurbit[6] in α-Hemolysin nanopore under varying pH, concentration of electrolytes and counterions (Li

Indexed as

BiosensorsElectrochemistryHost-guest interactionNanopore

Identifiers

PMID33786424
PMCPMC8006565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.