Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786387›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of aceclofenac.

Santosh Koirala, Prabin Nepal, Govinda Ghimire, Rojina Basnet, Ishwori Rawat, Aashma Dahal, Jitendra Pandey, Kalpana Parajuli-Baral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Formulating biopharmaceuticals using three-dimensional printing.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Santosh KoiralaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Prabin NepalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Govinda GhimireDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Rojina BasnetDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Ishwori RawatDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Aashma DahalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Jitendra PandeyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.
Kalpana Parajuli-BaralDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health and Allied Sciences, Pokhara University, Kaski, 33370, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This project was aimed to formulate and characterize mucoadhesive buccal tablets of aceclofenac, utilizing different proportions of three polymers carbopol 934, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Twelve batches of buccoadhesive aceclofenac were prepared by the direct compression method. The compressed tablets were then evaluated for physicochemical parameters such as hardness, thickness, weight variation, drug content, friability, swelling index, surface pH, and ex vivo mucoadhesion. In vitro dissolution test was conducted for 12 h according to Indian Pharmacopeia 2018, using the rotating paddle method in phosphate buffer of pH 7.4. Physiochemical parameters like weight variation (231.25-268.75 mg), hardness (8.32-11.56 kg), friability (0.04-0.2%), diameter (9.00 mm), thickness (3.8-4.05 mm), and drug content ((97.67-102.25%) were within the acceptable limit as per Indian Pharmacopeia 2018. The swelling index was reported to be in the range of 112.93-450.19%, at 8 h. The surface pHs of all the batches were in between 6.72 to 6.96. The mucoadhesive strengths (40.5-50 g) varied with the change in polymer concentrations especially of carbopol 934. The dissolution profile of all the batches varied greatly, with a maximum release of 109.41% (in batch 12 at 6 h) to a minimum release of 44.82% (in batch 3 at 12 h). Among them, only batch 1 ensured sustained and effective drug release (88.34% at 12 h) with appropriate swelling index (112.93%) and mucoadhesive strength (40 g). Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis showed no evidence of drug excipients interaction. Hence, the results concluded that buccal mucoadhesive aceclofenac tablets can be formulated. Furthermore, the property of the tablet not only depends on the concentration but also the behavior of the polymers used.

Indexed as

AceclofenacBuccal tabletsMucoadhesionSwelling index

Identifiers

PMID33786387
PMCPMC7988282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.