ArticleArthroplasty today2021
Measured Resection Techniques Do Not Align to the Cylindrical Axis in Kinematic Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere has been increasing interest with improved functional results in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Kinematic alignment seeks to replicate the rotational axes of the individual knee. The femoral component can either be aligned to the estimated prearthritic distal and posterior joint lines via a measured-resection technique or by aligning to the cylindrical axis (CA). The CA is calculated using three-dimensional imaging and defined as a line equidistant from the medial and lateral condylar surfaces from 15° to 115° flexion. This study investigates whether these 2 techniques lead to similar alignment angles in the coronal plane. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred three knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty were assessed using a computed tomography-based protocol. The image-based cylindrical axis coronal angle (CAA) was calculated, and the distal condylar coronal angle (DCA) was calculated to simulate a caliper measured resection technique. A computed tomographic planning software program was used to measure the offset from the distal-most extent of the calculated cylinder to the distal-most aspect of the condyles.
resultsThe DCA measured 3.3° valgus (standard deviation 2.4°) and the CAA 1.8° valgus (standard deviation 2.1°). The mean difference in offset from CAA radius to DCA from the medial condyle and the lateral condyle was 2.85 mm and 1.51 mm, respectively, increasing valgus predilection.
conclusionsCaliper measured resection kinematically aligned techniques will position the femoral component in a significantly more valgus position than when aligning to the CA of the knee. This is due to an increased offset of the distal femoral articulation from the most distal aspect of the cylinder on the medial side of the knee.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.