Transvenous lead extraction in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. High defibrillation threshold with right-sided ICD implantation was resolved by a dual coil lead via persistent left superior vena cava.Journal of cardiology cases · 2022
   Article
2. You can use it there too (2): Deployment of the Bridge occlusion balloon during transvenous lead extraction via a persistent left superior vena cava.HeartRhythm case reports · 2022
   Article
3. Transfemoral snare-assisted placement of a left-sided defibrillator lead in the presence of a persistent left superior vena cava.HeartRhythm case reports · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as