ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Patient specific total temporomandibular joint reconstruction: A review of biomaterial, designs, fabrication and outcomes.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Approaches for Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Mandible and Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction with Flow-through Fibula and Lateral Femoral Condyle Flaps: A Case Series.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Functional outcomes of total temporomandibular joint replacement with customized prostheses: a clinical case series.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Comparison of Patient-Specific Temporomandibular Joint Prostheses Using Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo Alloys: A Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From resection to reconstruction: patient-specific temporomandibular joint replacement in patients with ameloblastomas - a report of three cases.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Dental Polymers: The Versatility and Future Potential of Polyetheretherketone in Restorative Dentistry.Polymers · 2024Review
- An Overview of Clinical Conditions and a Systematic Review of Personalized TMJ Replacement.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- 3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Vascularized bone regeneration accelerated by 3D-printed nanosilicate-functionalized polycaprolactone scaffold.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Technical report and rare case description-patient-specific spacer made of bone cement for the revision of a PSI-TMJ fossa after screw fracture.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this article was to systematically review the available literature on patient specific total temporomandibular joint total joint replacement (PS-TMJR) implants for their biomaterial, designs, fabrication techniques and their outcomes.
methodsA literature review was conducted using PubMed, and science direct databases using the key words three-dimensional printing, 3D printing, CAD CAM, computer aided designing, computer aided manufacturing, additive technology, custom made implants, patient specific implants in combination with Temporomandibular joint, TMJ surgery.
resultsThe search revealed 2760 articles, of which 374 were in English and discussed TMJ reconstruction. Further filtering shortlisted 74 articles that discussed PS-TMJR. Duplicates were removed and additional added from article references. 39 articles describing biomaterial, designing and fabrication of PS-TMJR implants and their outcomes were selected for analysis.
conclusionsAlthough PS-TMJR implants allow a better anatomical fit, improved fixation, and safeguard various structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve, they vary in designs, material and fabrication techniques. However, PS-TMJR printed with SLM and EBM technologies have yet to be compared with the conventional ones in terms of mechanical strength, and clinical outcome. With emerging bioprinting technologies, even newer biomaterials should be considered for 3D printing of PS-TMJR devices designed to achieve harmony in function between the joint device, bone and masticatory muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.