Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786257›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021

The 100 Most-disruptive Articles in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Sub-specialties (1954-2014).

Marek A Hansdorfer, Sydney R Horen, Brandon E Alba, Jennifer N Akin, Amir H Dorafshar, Adan Z Becerra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perish or Publish?Archives of plastic surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 100 Disruptive Publications in Breast Cancer Research.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marek A HansdorferDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
Sydney R HorenDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
Brandon E AlbaDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
Jennifer N AkinDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
Amir H DorafsharDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.
Adan Z BecerraDepartment of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Ill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative bibliometrics have recently been the subject of significantly increased interest. The disruption index is a new bibliometric that was recently applied to surgery and urology and identifies papers that shift paradigms and eclipse previous research in a given field.

methodsThe 100 most-disruptive publications in the 14 most prominent plastic and reconstructive surgery and subspecialty journals were identified.

resultsWe present the 100 most-disruptive studies as well as the 100 most-cited studies for comparison in n=14 of the most popular plastic and reconstructive surgery (and subspecialty) journals between 1954 and 2014. The 100 most-disruptive publications in these journals were more disruptive than 99.8% of all PubMed papers. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) had the most papers in the top 100 (n=64) followed by British Journal of Plastic Surgery (currently Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, n=15), and Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (n=7). PRS had 9 of the top 10 papers. However, Clinics in Plastic Surgery had the highest average disruption score for all its published papers (0.0029). The correlation coefficient linking disruption scores and citation counts was 0.01 and 0.11, respectively. The most common decade represented in the top 100 was the 1980's (n=31) and the least common was the 2000's (n=9).

conclusionsThis is the first application of the disruption index to plastic and reconstructive surgery. The disruption score provides a unique ability to identify research that has shifted paradigms and driven the innovation that defines our specialty.

Identifiers

PMID33786257
PMCPMC7997101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.