ArticleCureus2021
Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in a Rural Area: Are We Paying Attention?
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a chronic, debilitating illness that mostly affects males under the age of 50 years. It is associated with myriad presentations. The National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) score was developed to measure the impact of the disease and assess the treatment outcomes. Additionally, the UPOINT [urinary (U), psychosocial (P), organ-specific (O), infection (I), neurologic/systemic (N), and tenderness of pelvic floor skeletal muscles (T)] classification system has been developed to enable a 'phenotypic approach' to the treatment. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the NIH-CPSI scores as well as the positive subdomain numbers and distribution of the UPOINT classification in patients with CP/CPPS. Materials and methods A total of 100 consecutive male patients presenting to a single centre with symptomatic CP/CPPS were included in this study. Results The mean age of the patients was 34.4 years. The average total NIH-CPSI score was 24.9. The average number of positive UPOINT domains was 2.28. The positive domains were urinary (90), psychosocial (60), organ-specific (43), infection (15), neurological (12), and tenderness (8). Discussion The NIH-CPSI scores and UPOINT subdomain scores compared favourably with other studies conducted in the region. The lower infection subdomain score as compared to other studies may be due to the widespread use of antibiotics among patients in the region prior to presenting to a urologist. Conclusion The use of the UPOINT classification to guide treatment is feasible even in a rural setting, such as in Kashmir.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.