Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786186›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and associated factors among pregnant women in Wolaita Sodo town, South Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study.

Alemu Bolanko, Hussen Namo, Kirubel Minsamo, Nigatu Addisu, Mohammed Gebre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Knowledge of Obstetric Danger Signs among Pregnant Women in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alemu BolankoEthiopia Transform: Primary Health Care (USAID), John Snow, Inc., Hawasa, Ethiopia.
Hussen NamoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Arsi University, Assela, Ethiopia.
Kirubel MinsamoDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-1068
Nigatu AddisuDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Mohammed GebreSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2262-0158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObstetric complications continue to be the major causes of maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Knowledge of women toward obstetric danger signs is an important part of improving maternal and fetal outcomes. However, the reported level of knowledge on obstetric danger signs is low and inconsistent.

methodsCommunity-based cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected from randomly selected 740 pregnant women. A pregnant woman said to have good knowledge of obstetric danger signs if she spontaneously mentioned at least two of the danger signs during each of the three periods (pregnancy, labor/childbirth, and postpartum) and otherwise said to have poor knowledge of obstetric danger signs. Adjusted odds ratio at 95% confidence interval and a value of p < 0.05 were used to identify the predictors.

resultsA total of 740 pregnant women participated in the study with the response rate of 97.5%. One hundred twenty-four (16.8%) of the respondents were knowledgeable about obstetric danger signs. According to our study, age range of 20-24 years (adjusted odds ratio = 6, confidence interval: 2.67-17.44) and 25-29 years old (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4, confidence interval: 1.14-5.10); being housewife (adjusted odds ratio = 0.5, confidence interval: 0.28-0.87); monthly income of ⩽1000ETB (adjusted odds ratio = 0.24, confidence interval: 0.12-0.46) and 1001-2500ETB (adjusted odds ratio = 0.24, confidence interval: 0.12-0.47); and primigravida (adjusted odds ratio = 0.09, confidence interval: 0.04-0.18) and primipara (adjusted odds ratio = 0.15, confidence interval: 0.07-0.30) were factors significantly associated with knowledge of obstetric danger signs.

conclusionKnowledge of obstetric danger signs among pregnant women was low. Maternal age, average monthly income, maternal occupation, parity, and gravidity were factors significantly associated with the knowledge of obstetric danger signs.

Indexed as

EthiopiaknowledgeObstetrics danger signsWolaita Sodo

Identifiers

PMID33786186
PMCPMC7958171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.