Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33786171›Full record

ReviewWIREs. Water

Floods and the COVID-19 pandemic-A new double hazard problem.

Slobodan P Simonovic, Zbigniew W Kundzewicz, Nigel Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in WIREs. Water. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The impact of flooding on food security across Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Interactions between climate and COVID-19.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The perceived effectiveness and hidden inequity of postpandemic fiscal stimuli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Slobodan P SimonovicInstitute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, The University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5072-2915
Zbigniew W KundzewiczInstitute for Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences Poznan Poland.
Nigel WrightSchool of Architecture Design and the Built Environment Nottingham Trent University UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-2830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coincidence of floods and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a genuine multihazard problem. Since the beginning of 2020, many regions around the World have been experiencing this double hazard of serious flooding and the pandemic. There have been 70 countries with flood events occurring after detection of the country's first COVID-19 case and hundreds of thousands of people have been evacuated. The main objective of this article is to assess challenges that arise from complex intersections between the threat multipliers and to provide guidance on how to address them effectively. We consider the limitations of our knowledge including "unknown unknowns." During emergency evacuation, practicing social distancing can be very difficult. However, people are going to take action to respond to rising waters, even if it means breaking quarantine. This is an emergency manager's nightmare scenario: two potentially serious emergencies happening at once. During this unprecedented year (2020), we are experiencing one of the most challenging flood seasons we have seen in a while. Practical examples of issues and guides for managing floods and COVID-19 are presented. We feel that a new approach is needed in dealing with multiple hazards. Our main messages are: a resilience approach is needed whether in response to floods or a pandemic; preparation is vital, in addition to defense; the responsible actors must be prepared with actions plans and command structure, while the general population must be involved in the discussions so that they are aware of the risk and the reasons for the actions they must take. This article is categorized under:Engineering Water > Methods.

Indexed as

COVID‐19floodsmanagementmultihazardnatural disastersresilience

Identifiers

PMID33786171
PMCPMC7995187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.