ArticleEnvironmental chemistry letters2021
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?
Article in Environmental chemistry letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis to explain unknown causes of the origins of SARS-COV-2.Environmental research · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- SARS-CoV-2 versus Influenza A Virus: Characteristics and Co-Treatments.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Site-specific glycosylation of SARS-CoV-2: Big challenges in mass spectrometry analysis.Proteomics · 2022Review
- An insight into SARS-CoV-2 structure, pathogenesis, target hunting for drug development and vaccine initiatives.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2022Review
- There is no "origin" to SARS-CoV-2.Environmental research · 2022Article
- Origin of COVID-19: Dismissing the Mojiang mine theory and the laboratory accident narrative.Environmental research · 2022Article
- Thus spoke peptides: SARS-CoV-2 spike gene evolved in humans and then shortly in rats while the rest of its genome in horseshoe bats and then in treeshrews.Communicative & integrative biology · 2022Article
- The SARS-CoV-2 origin dilemma: Zoonotic transfer or laboratory leak?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022Article
- An appeal for an objective, open, and transparent scientific debate about the origin of SARS-CoV-2.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Article
- What we know and what we need to know about the origin of SARS-CoV-2.Environmental research · 2021Article
- Have artificial lighting and noise pollution caused zoonosis and the COVID-19 pandemic? A review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.