Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785997›Full record

ArticleAquatic sciences2021

Nitrogen removal processes in lakes of different trophic states from on-site measurements and historic data.

Beat Müller, Raoul Thoma, Kathrin B L Baumann, Cameron M Callbeck, Carsten J Schubert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aquatic sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beat MüllerEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-9035
Raoul ThomaEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Kathrin B L BaumannEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-1843
Cameron M CallbeckEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7602-3338
Carsten J SchubertEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-5967
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater lakes are essential hotspots for the removal of excessive anthropogenic nitrogen (N) loads transported from the land to coastal oceans. The biogeochemical processes responsible for N removal, the corresponding transformation rates and overall removal efficiencies differ between lakes, however, it is unclear what the main controlling factors are. Here, we investigated the factors that moderate the rates of N removal under contrasting trophic states in two lakes located in central Switzerland. In the eutrophic Lake Baldegg and the oligotrophic Lake Sarnen, we specifically examined seasonal sediment porewater chemistry, organic matter sedimentation rates, as well as 33-year of historic water column data. We find that the eutrophic Lake Baldegg, which contributed to the removal of 20 ± 6.6 gN m SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00027-021-00795-7.

Indexed as

Combined nitrification–denitrificationNitrogen removal efficiencyNitrogen removal rateSediment porewater fluxesWhole-lake nitrogen budget

Identifiers

PMID33785997
PMCPMC7946664
OpenAlexW3134130768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.