Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785852›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Machine learning is the key to diagnose COVID-19: a proof-of-concept study.

Cedric Gangloff, Sonia Rafi, Guillaume Bouzillé, Louis Soulat, Marc Cuggia

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Novel Comparative Study for the Detection of COVID-19 Using CT Scan and Chest X-ray Images.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cedric GangloffUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000, Rennes, France. cedric.ganglof@gmail.com.
Sonia RafiUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Guillaume BouzilléUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Louis SoulatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU Rennes, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Marc CuggiaUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is the accepted standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. As any test, RT-PCR provides false negative results that can be rectified by clinicians by confronting clinical, biological and imaging data. The combination of RT-PCR and chest-CT could improve diagnosis performance, but this would requires considerable resources for its rapid use in all patients with suspected COVID-19. The potential contribution of machine learning in this situation has not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate machine learning models using routine clinical and laboratory data to improve the performance of RT-PCR and chest-CT for COVID-19 diagnosis among post-emergency hospitalized patients. All adults admitted to the ED for suspected COVID-19, and then hospitalized at Rennes academic hospital, France, between March 20, 2020 and May 5, 2020 were included in the study. Three model types were created: logistic regression, random forest, and neural network. Each model was trained to diagnose COVID-19 using different sets of variables. Area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUC) was the primary outcome to evaluate model's performances. 536 patients were included in the study: 106 in the COVID group, 430 in the NOT-COVID group. The AUC values of chest-CT and RT-PCR increased from 0.778 to 0.892 and from 0.852 to 0.930, respectively, with the contribution of machine learning. After generalization, machine learning models will allow increasing chest-CT and RT-PCR performances for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningArea Under CurveCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansProof of Concept StudyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33785852
PMCPMC8009887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.