Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Identification of variation in nutritional practice in neonatal units in England and association with clinical outcomes using agnostic machine learning.

Sam F Greenbury, Kayleigh Ougham, Jinyi Wu, Cheryl Battersby, Chris Gale, Neena Modi, Elsa D Angelini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Growth disparities among NICUs: insights from the New Jersey statewide neonatal collaborative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. AI to predict extrauterine growth restriction during transitional nutrition of preterm infants: a retrospective study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sam F GreenburyNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, ITMAT Data Science Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kayleigh OughamSection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Jinyi WuNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, ITMAT Data Science Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cheryl BattersbySection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Chris GaleSection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Neena ModiSection of Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Elsa D AngeliniNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, ITMAT Data Science Group, Imperial College London, London, UK. e.angelini@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used agnostic, unsupervised machine learning to cluster a large clinical database of information on infants admitted to neonatal units in England. Our aim was to obtain insights into nutritional practice, an area of central importance in newborn care, utilising the UK National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD). We performed clustering on time-series data of daily nutritional intakes for very preterm infants born at a gestational age less than 32 weeks (n = 45,679) over a six-year period. This revealed 46 nutritional clusters heterogeneous in size, showing common interpretable clinical practices alongside rarer approaches. Nutritional clusters with similar admission profiles revealed associations between nutritional practice, geographical location and outcomes. We show how nutritional subgroups may be regarded as distinct interventions and tested for associations with measurable outcomes. We illustrate the potential for identifying relationships between nutritional practice and outcomes with two examples, discharge weight and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We identify the well-known effect of formula milk on greater discharge weight as well as support for the plausible, but insufficiently evidenced view that human milk is protective against BPD. Our framework highlights the potential of agnostic machine learning approaches to deliver clinical practice insights and generate hypotheses using routine data.

Indexed as

Birth WeightDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalEnglandFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMachine LearningMaleMilk, HumanNutritional Support

Identifiers

PMID33785776
PMCPMC8009880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.