ArticleScientific reports2021
Development of a novel transcription factors-related prognostic signature for serous ovarian cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating prognostic features in high-grade serous ovarian cancer through gene regulatory network inference with single-cell transcriptomic profiles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Pyroptosis-Related LncRNA Signature for Predicting Prognosis, Immune Features and Drug Sensitivity in Ovarian Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of a NAD+ metabolism-derived gene signature to predict the prognosis and immune landscape in endometrial cancer.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Biology-driven therapy advances in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Role of SLC31A1 in prognosis and immune infiltration in breast cancer: a novel insight.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024Article
- Identification and validation of a novel prognostic signature based on transcription factors in breast cancer by bioinformatics analysis.Gland surgery · 2022Article
- Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of a Novel Lipid Metabolism-Related Gene Signature for Predicting the Prognosis and Immune Landscape in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Identification and validation of an immune-related lncRNAs signature to predict the overall survival of ovarian cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of a glycolysis-related gene signature for survival prediction of ovarian cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggest that transcription factors (TFs) play vital roles in serous ovarian cancer (SOC). In the present study, TFs mRNA expression profiles of 564 SOC subjects in the TCGA database, and 70 SOC subjects in the GEO database were screened. A 17-TFs related prognostic signature was constructed using lasso cox regression and validated in the TCGA and GEO cohorts. Consensus clustering analysis was applied to establish a cluster model. The 17-TFs related prognostic signature, risk score and cluster models were effective at accurately distinguishing the overall survival of SOC. Analysis of genomic alterations were used to elaborate on the association between the 17-TFs related prognostic signature and genomic aberrations. The GSEA assay results suggested that there was a significant difference in the inflammatory and immune response pathways between the high-risk and low-risk score groups. The potential immune infiltration, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy responses were analyzed due to the significant difference in the regulation of lymphocyte migration and T cell-mediated cytotoxicity between the two groups. The results indicated that patients with low-risk score were more likely to respond anti-PD-1, etoposide, paclitaxel, and veliparib but not to gemcitabine, doxorubicin, docetaxel, and cisplatin. Also, the prognostic nomogram model revealed that the risk score was a good prognostic indicator for SOC patients. In conclusion, we explored the prognostic values of TFs in SOC and developed a 17-TFs related prognostic signature to predict the survival of SOC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.