Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785730›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Attentive brain states in infants with and without later autism.

Anna Gui, Giorgia Bussu, Charlotte Tye, Mayada Elsabbagh, Greg Pasco, Tony Charman, Mark H Johnson, Emily J H Jones

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Social attention in anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorder: Role of social motivation.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna GuiCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. agui01@mail.bbk.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1108-0774
Giorgia BussuDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Charlotte TyeDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Department of Psychology, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Mayada ElsabbaghMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 Rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-9059
Greg PascoDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Tony CharmanDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-6549
Mark H JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Emily J H JonesCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. e.jones@bbk.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-9540
King's College London · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CARadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701484Medical Research Council MR/K021389/1Medical Research Council MR/T003057/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early difficulties in engaging attentive brain states in social settings could affect learning and have cascading effects on social development. We investigated this possibility using multichannel electroencephalography during a face/non-face paradigm in 8-month-old infants with (FH, n = 91) and without (noFH, n = 40) a family history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). An event-related potential component reflecting attention engagement, the Nc, was compared between FH infants who received a diagnosis of ASD at 3 years of age (FH-ASD; n = 19), FH infants who did not (FH-noASD; n = 72) and noFH infants (who also did not, hereafter noFH-noASD; n = 40). 'Prototypical' microstates during social attention were extracted from the noFH-noASD group and examined in relation to later categorical and dimensional outcome. Machine-learning was used to identify the microstate features that best predicted ASD and social adaptive skills at three years. Results suggested that whilst measures of brain state timing were related to categorical ASD outcome, brain state strength was related to dimensional measures of social functioning. Specifically, the FH-ASD group showed shorter Nc latency relative to other groups, and duration of the attentive microstate responses to faces was informative for categorical outcome prediction. Reduced Nc amplitude difference between faces with direct gaze and a non-social control stimulus and strength of the attentive microstate to faces contributed to the prediction of dimensional variation in social skills. Taken together, this provides consistent evidence that atypical attention engagement precedes the emergence of difficulties in socialization and indicates that using the spatio-temporal characteristics of whole-brain activation to define brain states in infancy provides an important new approach to understanding of the neurodevelopmental mechanisms that lead to ASD.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAttentionBrainElectroencephalographyHumansInfant

Identifiers

PMID33785730
PMCPMC8009890
OpenAlexW3142096282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.