Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785673›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2021

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia hydromorphone combined with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

Ying Huang, Chenjie Xu, Tao Zeng, Zhongming Li, Yanzhi Xia, Gaojian Tao, Tong Zhu, Lijuan Lu, Jing Li, Taiyuan Huang and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ying HuangDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-4739
Chenjie XuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5942-7015
Tao ZengDepartment of Pain, Kunshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1497-3279
Zhongming LiDepartment of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-3037
Yanzhi XiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-7698
Gaojian TaoDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-096X
Tong ZhuDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5901-4712
Lijuan LuDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5655-0971
Jing LiDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-825X
Taiyuan HuangDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-1437
Hongbo HuaiDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-7266
Benxiang NingDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-3307
Chao MaDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7911-9084
Xinxing WangDepartment of Pain Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-3105
Yuhua ChangDepartment of Pain, Bayingolin Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Xinjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-3595
Peng MaoDepartment of Pain Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-653X
Jian LinDepartment of Pain, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-3774
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNantong University · CNShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of acute herpes zoster. The treatment of PHN remains a challenge for clinical pain management. Despite the effectiveness of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and lidocaine patches in reducing PHN, many patients still face intractable pain disorders. In this randomized controlled study, we evaluated whether hydromorphone through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) was effective in relieving PHN.

methodsPatients with PHN were randomly divided into two groups, one group received oral pregabalin with IV normal saline, another group received oral pregabalin with additional IV PCA hydromorphone for two weeks. Efficacy was evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the end of the treatments.

resultsTwo hundred and one patients were followed up for 12 weeks. After treatment, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of patients in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference of NRS scores between the two groups was statistically significant at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. The frequency of breakthrough pain in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than that in the control group 1 and 4 weeks after treatment. After treatment, the quality of sleep in the hydromorphone group was significantly improved compared with the control group. The most common adverse reactions in the hydromorphone group were dizziness and nausea, with no significant respiratory depression.

conclusionsIV PCA hydromorphone combined with oral pregabalin provides superior pain relief in patients with PHN, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnticonvulsantsHydromorphoneNeuralgia, PostherpeticOpiate AlkaloidsPain, IntractablePain ManagementPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID33785673
PMCPMC8019957
OpenAlexW3143776421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.