Selecting optimal patients with gastroparesis for G-POEM procedure.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Imaging in Gastroparesis: Exploring Innovative Diagnostic Approaches, Symptoms, and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
2. Third-space endoscopy: the final frontier.Gastroenterology report · 2023
   Review
3. Fasting pyloric diameter and distensibility by functional endoluminal imaging probe in unsedated healthy volunteers.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022
   Article
4. Comprehensive characterization of antral and pyloric contractions by high resolution manometry: applied physiology in suspected gastroparesis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as