Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785496›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Clinical and cost effectiveness of a corticosteroid injection versus exercise therapy for shoulder pain in general practice: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (SIX Study).

Pieter F van Doorn, Evelien I T de Schepper, Dieuwke Schiphof, Ramon P G Ottenheijm, Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf, Marc A Koopmanschap, John M van Ochten, Danielle A van der Windt, Patrick J E Bindels, Bart W Koes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pieter F van DoornGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands p.vandoorn@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3208-3475
Evelien I T de SchepperGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieuwke SchiphofGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ramon P G OttenheijmFamily Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marloes Thoomes-de GraafFysio-Experts, Hazerswoude Rijndijk, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2865-5389
Marc A KoopmanschapHealth Economics and HTA, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John M van OchtenGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Danielle A van der WindtPrimary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Patrick J E BindelsGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart W KoesGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos RunhaarGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLKeele University · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShoulder pain is common and the prognosis is often unfavourable. Dutch guidelines on the treatment of shoulder pain in primary care recommend a corticosteroid injection or a referral to exercise therapy, if initial pain management fails and pain persists. However, evidence of the effectiveness of a corticosteroid injection compared with exercise therapy, especially in the long term, is limited. This trial will assess the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a corticosteroid injection compared with physiotherapist-led exercise therapy over 12 months follow-up in patients with shoulder pain in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The SIX Study is a multicentre, pragmatic randomised clinical trial in primary care. A total of 213 patients with shoulder pain, aged ≥18 years presenting in general practice will be included. Patients will be randomised (1:1) into two groups: a corticosteroid injection or 12 sessions of physiotherapist-led exercise therapy. The effect of the allocated treatment will be assessed through questionnaires at 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome is patient's reported shoulder pain-intensity and function, measured with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, over 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include cost effectiveness, pain-intensity, function, health-related quality of life, sleep quality, patient's global perceived effect, work absence, healthcare utilisation and adverse events. Between group differences will be evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis with linear effects models. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to assess the cost effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years from a medical and societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam (MEC 2020-0300). All participants will give written informed consent prior to data collection. The results from this study will be disseminated in international journals and implemented in the primary care guidelines on shoulder pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Registry (NL8854).

Indexed as

General PracticeShoulder PainAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisExercise TherapyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex Hormonesclinical trialsprimary careshoulder

Identifiers

PMID33785496
PMCPMC8011792
OpenAlexW3140014543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.