Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785493›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Olivia Nina Baenziger, Laura Ford, Amelia Yazidjoglou, Grace Joshy, Emily Banks

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Recommendations on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Vaping Education in Australian High Schools: A Quality Improvement Project.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia Nina BaenzigerThe University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-7542
Laura FordThe National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Amelia YazidjoglouThe National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4406-368X
Grace JoshyThe National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-6368
Emily BanksThe National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia emily.banks@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4617-1302
Australian National University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review and summarise the current evidence on the uptake of combustible cigarette smoking following e-cigarette use in non-smokers-including never-smokers, people not currently smoking and past smokers-through an umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis.

designUmbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsychINFO (Ovid), Medline (Ovid) and Wiley Cochrane Library up to April 2020.

resultsOf 6225 results, 25 studies of non-smokers-never, not current and former smokers-with a baseline measure of e-cigarette use and an outcome measure of combustible smoking uptake were included. All 25 studies found increased risk of smoking uptake with e-cigarette exposure, although magnitude varied substantially. Using a random-effects model, comparing e-cigarette users versus non-e-cigarette users, among never-smokers at baseline the OR for smoking initiation was 3.25 (95% CI 2.61 to 4.05, I

conclusionsAcross multiple settings, non-smokers who use e-cigarettes are consistently more likely than those avoiding e-cigarettes to initiate combustible cigarette smoking and become current smokers. The magnitude of this risk varied, with an average of around three times the odds. Former smokers using e-cigarettes have over twice the odds of relapse as non-e-cigarettes users. This study is the first to our knowledge to review and pool data on the latter topic. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020168596.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingHumansNon-SmokersRecurrenceSmokersSmokingepidemiologypublic healthrespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID33785493
PMCPMC8011717
OpenAlexW3151835786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.