ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry
How the Protein Data Bank changed biology: An introduction to the JBC Reviews thematic series, part 1.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Atoms to Cells: AI-Based Structure Prediction Fueling Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Computational Structural Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Predicting Inhibition of CDK2 with SAnDReS: The Application of Machine Learning to Navigate the Scoring Function Space.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- AI: A transformative opportunity in cell biology.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Review
- Protein structures unravel the signatures and patterns of deep time evolution.QRB discovery · 2024Review
- Interaction of Vanadium Complexes with Proteins: Revisiting the Reported Structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) since 2015.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Protein structure prediction from the complementary science perspective.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
- High-throughput computational investigation of protein electrostatics and cavity for SAM-dependent methyltransferases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Article
- AssignSLP_GUI, a software tool exploiting AI for NMR resonance assignment of sparsely labeled proteins.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022Article
- A graph representation of molecular ensembles for polymer property prediction.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Review
- Trends in HSPB5 research: a 36-year bibliometric analysis.Cell stress & chaperones · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This collection of articles celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Protein Data Bank (PDB), the single global digital archive of biological macromolecular structures. The impact of the PDB is immense; we have invited a number of top researchers in structural biology to illustrate its influence on an array of scientific fields. What emerges is a compelling picture of the synergism between the PDB and the explosive progress witnessed in many scientific areas. Availability of reliable, openly accessible, well-archived structural information has arguably had more impact on cell and molecular biology than even some of the enabling technologies such as PCR. We have seen the science move from a time when structural biologists contributed the lion's share of the structures to the PDB and for discussion within their community to a time when any effort to achieve in-depth understanding of a biochemical or cell biological question demands an interdisciplinary approach built atop structural underpinnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.