Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785328›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2021

Uncertainty of laboratory and portable solid particle number systems for regulatory measurements of vehicle emissions.

Barouch Giechaskiel, Tero Lähde, Anastasios D Melas, Victor Valverde, Michaël Clairotte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of On-Board and Laboratory Gas Measurement Systems for Future Heavy-Duty Emissions Regulations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Barouch GiechaskielEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: barouch.giechaskiel@ec.europa.eu.
Tero LähdeEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: tero.lahde@ec.europa.eu.
Anastasios D MelasEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: anastasios.melas@ec.europa.eu.
Victor ValverdeEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: victor.valverde-morales@ec.europa.eu.
Michaël ClairotteEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: michael.clairotte@ec.europa.eu.
European Commission · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the European Union's emissions regulations, limits for solid particles >23 nm are applicable for the type-approval and in use compliance of vehicles. Consequently, particle number (PN) systems are used very often for both research and development of engines and vehicles, both in the laboratory and on the road. The technical specifications of the laboratory and portable on-board systems are not the same resulting in different measurement uncertainties. Furthermore, particles, in contrast to gases, can be lost in the transfer lines making comparisons at different sampling locations difficult. Moreover, the size dependent counting efficiency of the systems can result in high discrepancies when the measured particle sizes are close to the decreasing steep part of the curves. The different sampling locations (tailpipe or dilution tunnel) and thermal pretreatments of the aerosol further enhance the differences. The studies on the measurement uncertainty are scarce, especially for the PN systems measuring from 10 nm that will be introduced in the future regulations. This study quantified the uncertainty sources of the PN systems: (i) due to the technical requirements and the calibrations, (ii) due to the unknown particle sizes during measurement, (iii) due to particle losses from the vehicle to the PN systems at the tailpipe or the dilution tunnel, (iv) other parameters needed for the calculation of the emissions, non-related to the PN systems, e.g. flow and distance. The expanded uncertainty of the 23 nm laboratory systems sampling from the dilution tunnel was estimated to be 32%, with 18% originating from the calibration procedures, while of those sampling from the tailpipe 34%. For the 23 nm portable systems measuring on-road the uncertainty was 39%. The values were 2-8% higher for the 10 nm systems.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsVehicle EmissionsEnvironmental MonitoringLaboratoriesParticle SizeParticulate MatterUncertaintyAir PollutantsParticulate MatterVehicle EmissionsCondensation particle counter (CPC)Diffusion charger (DC)Particle measurement programme (PMP)Particle number counter (PNC)Portable emissions measurement system (PEMS)Volatile particle remover (VPR)

Identifiers

PMID33785328
PMCPMC8261828
OpenAlexW3145408574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.