Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785256›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2021

Nascent Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Drives Evolution and Resistance to Intense Hormonal Therapy.

Scott Wilkinson, Huihui Ye, Fatima Karzai, Stephanie A Harmon, Nicholas T Terrigino, David J VanderWeele, John R Bright, Rayann Atway, Shana Y Trostel, Nicole V Carrabba and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Chromatin regulatorsChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Scott WilkinsonLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Huihui YeDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology and Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Fatima KarzaiGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephanie A HarmonMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Nicholas T TerriginoLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David J VanderWeeleLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
John R BrightLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rayann AtwayLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shana Y TrostelLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nicole V CarrabbaLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nichelle C WhitlockLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stephanie M WalkerMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rosina T LisLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Houssein Abdul SaterGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brian J CapaldoLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ravi A MadanGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
James L GulleyGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Guinevere ChunGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Daniela C SallesDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Harsimar B KaurDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tamara L LotanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David J VenzonBiostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William L DahutGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Adam G SowalskyLaboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: adam.sowalsky@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Cancer Therapy Clinical Trials Using Novel Recombinant VaccinesZIABC010666 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2009 to 2025
$22.4M
Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
Office of Collaborative BiostatisticsZIDSC007202 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOO-WOSOBA, HYOYOUNG · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Laboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis Microscopy Core FacilityZICBC010947 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LAKE, ROSS · 2009 to 2025
$11.0M
The Evaluation of Novel Therapeutics for Genitourinary MalignanciesZIASC010098 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI DAHUT, WILLIAM L. · 2009 to 2022
$7.6M
Molecular alterations driving the development of primary prostate cancersZIABC011679 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SOWALSKY, ADAM · 2016 to 2025
$6.9M
Mechanisms of resistance to treatment in aggressive prostate cancersZIABC011838 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SOWALSKY, ADAM · 2018 to 2025
$5.7M
Imaging, image guided biopsy and treatment of prostate cancerZIABC012062 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010666Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011679Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011838NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients diagnosed with high risk localized prostate cancer have variable outcomes following surgery. Trials of intense neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) have shown lower rates of recurrence among patients with minimal residual disease after treatment. The molecular features that distinguish exceptional responders from poor responders are not known.

objectiveTo identify genomic and histologic features associated with treatment resistance at baseline. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsTargeted biopsies were obtained from 37 men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer before receiving 6 mo of ADT plus enzalutamide. Biopsy tissues were used for whole-exome sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed the relationship of molecular features with final pathologic response using a cutpoint of 0.05 cm RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Loss of chromosome 10q (containing PTEN) and alterations to TP53 were predictive of poor response, as were the expression of nuclear ERG on IHC and the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Patients with incompletely and nonresponding tumors harbored greater tumor diversity as estimated via phylogenetic tree reconstruction from DNA sequencing and analysis of IHC staining. Our four-factor binary model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.89) to predict poor response correlated with greater diversity in our cohort and a validation cohort of 57 Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. When baseline tumor volume was added to the model, it distinguished poor response to NADT with an AUC of 0.98. Prospective use of this model requires further retrospective validation with biopsies from additional trials.

conclusionsA subset of prostate cancers exhibit greater histologic and genomic diversity at the time of diagnosis, and these localized tumors have greater fitness to resist therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Some prostate cancer tumors do not respond well to a hormonal treatment called androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We used tumor volume and four other parameters to develop a model to identify tumors that will not respond well to ADT. Treatments other than ADT should be considered for these patients.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogensHumansMalePhylogenyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensAndrogen deprivation therapyDiversityEnzalutamideEvolutionGenomicsImmunohistochemistryNeoadjuvantProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33785256
PMCPMC8473585
OpenAlexW3145167910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.