Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785074›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Exploring community engaged research experiences and preferences: a multi-level qualitative investigation.

Hae-Ra Han, Ashley Xu, Kyra J W Mendez, Safiyyah Okoye, Joycelyn Cudjoe, Mona Bahouth, Melanie Reese, Lee Bone, Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Women's musculoskeletal health: insights from the 2024 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on chronic conditions.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Consumer Engagement in Chronic Conditions Research: An Integrated Framework Informed by Recognition Theory.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hae-Ra HanThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA. hhan3@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-594X
Ashley XuThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kyra J W MendezThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Safiyyah OkoyeThe Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joycelyn CudjoeGovernment Accountability Office, Washington, DC, USA.
Mona BahouthThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Melanie ReeseThe Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Community Engagement Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lee BoneThe Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Community Engagement Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cheryl Dennison-HimmelfarbThe Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USGoucher College · USUnited States Government Accountability Office · US

Funding

QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS OF AGINGT32AG000247 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen J. Bandeen-Roche · 1996 to 2026
$13.2M
PLAN: Dementia Literacy Education and Navigation for Korean Elders with Probable Dementia and their CaregiversR01AG062649 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAN, HAE-RA · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Hopkins Center to Promote resilience in persons and families living with multiple chronic conditions (the PROMOTE Center)P30NR018093 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JACQUELYN CUTLER · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) U54AI108332National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) UL1TR003098NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062649NIA NIH HHS R01AG062649NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000247NINR NIH HHS P30 NR018093NINR NIH HHS P30NR018093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity engagement may make research more relevant, translatable, and sustainable, hence improving the possibility of reducing health disparities. The purpose of this study was to explore strategies for community engagement adopted by research teams and identify areas for enhancing engagement in future community engaged research.

methodsThe Community Engagement Program of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research hosted a forum to engage researchers and community partners in group discussion to reflect on their diverse past and current experiences in planning, implementing, and evaluating community engagement in health research. A total of 50 researchers, research staff, and community partners participated in five concurrent semi-structured group interviews and a whole group wrap-up session. Group interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis.

resultsFour themes with eight subthemes were identified. Main themes included: Community engagement is an ongoing and iterative process; Community partner roles must be well-defined and clearly communicated; Mutual trust and transparency are central to community engagement; and Measuring community outcomes is an evolving area. Relevant subthemes were: engaging community partners in various stages of research; mission-driven vs. "checking the box"; breadth and depth of engagement; roles of community partner; recruitment and selection of community partners; building trust; clear communication for transparency; and conflict in community engaged research.

conclusionThe findings highlight the benefits and challenges of community engaged research. Enhanced capacity building for community engagement, including training and communication tools for both community and researcher partners, are needed.

Indexed as

Community engaged researchGroup interviewsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID33785074
PMCPMC8008581
OpenAlexW3148743035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.