ArticleMovement ecology2021
An evaluation of machine learning classifiers for next-generation, continuous-ethogram smart trackers.
Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining Accelerometer-Based Animal Behaviour Classifications With Sequence-Informed Post-Processing.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Prediction of Ammonia and Methane Concentrations and Emissions in Dairy Barns Using Artificial Neural Networks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Between the Trees: Quantifying Koala Ground Movement for Conservation Action.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Commuting in crosswinds and foraging in fast winds: the foraging ecology of a flying fish specialist.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Discrimination of the Lame Limb in Horses Using a Machine Learning Method (Support Vector Machine) Based on Asymmetry Indices Measured by the EQUISYM System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Acoustic-based machine learning approaches for depression detection in Chinese university students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A benchmark for computational analysis of animal behavior, using animal-borne tags.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Development of a multisensor biologging collar and analytical techniques to describe high-resolution spatial behavior in free-ranging terrestrial mammals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Key Grazing Behaviours of Beef Cattle Identify Specific Genotypes of the Glutamate Metabotropic Receptor 5 Gene (GRM5).Behavior genetics · 2024Observational
- Time-domain heart rate variability features for automatic congestive heart failure prediction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Deep learning approach for early prediction of COVID-19 mortality using chest X-ray and electronic health records.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Supervised versus unsupervised approaches to classification of accelerometry data.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Increasingly detailed insights in animal behaviours using continuous on-board processing of accelerometer data.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- Identification of reindeer fine-scale foraging behaviour using tri-axial accelerometer data.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation.Nature communications · 2022Review
- Prediction and Screening Model for Products Based on Fusion Regression and XGBoost Classification.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- R package for animal behavior classification from accelerometer data-rabc.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Leaf area index estimation model for UAV image hyperspectral data based on wavelength variable selection and machine learning methods.Plant methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur understanding of movement patterns and behaviours of wildlife has advanced greatly through the use of improved tracking technologies, including application of accelerometry (ACC) across a wide range of taxa. However, most ACC studies either use intermittent sampling that hinders continuity or continuous data logging relying on tracker retrieval for data downloading which is not applicable for long term study. To allow long-term, fine-scale behavioural research, we evaluated a range of machine learning methods for their suitability for continuous on-board classification of ACC data into behaviour categories prior to data transmission.
methodsWe tested six supervised machine learning methods, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to classify behaviour using ACC data from three bird species (white stork Ciconia ciconia, griffon vulture Gyps fulvus and common crane Grus grus) and two mammals (dairy cow Bos taurus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus).
resultsUsing a range of quality criteria, SVM, ANN, RF and XGBoost performed well in determining behaviour from ACC data and their good performance appeared little affected when greatly reducing the number of input features for model training. On-board runtime and storage-requirement tests showed that notably ANN, RF and XGBoost would make suitable on-board classifiers.
conclusionsOur identification of using feature reduction in combination with ANN, RF and XGBoost as suitable methods for on-board behavioural classification of continuous ACC data has considerable potential to benefit movement ecology and behavioural research, wildlife conservation and livestock husbandry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.