Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33785022›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Efficacy of the association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for the treatment of solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective single-center study.

Zhenfeng Deng, Zongrui Jin, Yonghui Qin, Mingqi Wei, Jilong Wang, Tingting Lu, Ling Zhang, Jingjing Zeng, Li Bao, Ya Guo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CD4World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. State-of-the-art surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhenfeng Deng *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zongrui Jin *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yonghui QinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Mingqi WeiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jilong WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Tingting LuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Ling ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jingjing ZengDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Li BaoKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Ya GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Minhao PengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Banghao XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China. xubanghao525799@163.com.
Zhang WenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China. wenzgxmu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-540X

Funding

Emergency and Medical Rescue Talent Small Highland in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region • Open Topics of Key Laboratory for Emergency Medicine in Guangxi Universities GXJZ201501Guangxi medical and health technology development and application project S2018100Guangxi medical and health technology development and application project) S2019097"Medical Excellence Award" funded by the creative research development grant from the first affiliated hospital of Guangxi Medical University 180327National Natural Science Foundation of China 81560387National Natural Science Foundation of China 81902983Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province 2018JJB140382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe feasibility of association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, maximal diameter ≥ 10 cm) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of ALPPS for patients with solitary huge HCC.

methodsTwenty patients with solitary huge HCC who received ALPPS during January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The oncological characteristics of contemporaneous patients who underwent one-stage resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were compared using propensity score matching (PSM).

resultsAll patients underwent complete two-staged ALPPS. The median future liver remnant from the ALPPS-I stage to the ALPPS-II stage increased by 64.5% (range = 22.3-221.9%) with a median interval of 18 days (range = 10-54 days). The 90-day mortality rate after the ALPPS-II stage was 5%. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.0% and 57.4%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 60.0% and 43.0%, respectively. In the one-to-one PSM analysis, the long-term survival of patients who received ALPPS was significantly better than those who received TACE (OS, P = 0.007; PFS, P = 0.011) but comparable with those who underwent one-stage resection (OS, P = 0.463; PFS, P = 0.786).

conclusionThe surgical outcomes of ALPPS were superior to those of TACE and similar to those of one-stage resection. ALPPS is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with unresectable solitary huge HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLigationPortal VeinPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeALPPSFuture liver remnantOutcomesSolitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33785022
PMCPMC8011225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.