Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33784915›Full record

SynthesisPalliative medicine2021

The experience of delirium in palliative care settings for patients, family, clinicians and volunteers: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Imogen Featherstone, Annmarie Hosie, Najma Siddiqi, Pamela Grassau, Shirley H Bush, Johanna Taylor, Trevor Sheldon, Miriam J Johnson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Delirium severity trajectories and survival outcome in palliative care patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improving thePalliative medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imogen FeatherstoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9042-7600
Annmarie HosieSchool of Nursing, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-2124
Najma SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Pamela GrassauSchool of Social Work, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Shirley H BushDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Johanna TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-0900
Trevor SheldonInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Miriam J JohnsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-9158

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is common in palliative care settings and is distressing for patients, their families and clinicians. To develop effective interventions, we need first to understand current delirium care in this setting.

aimTo understand patient, family, clinicians' and volunteers' experience of delirium and its care in palliative care contexts.

designQualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018102417). DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched: CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO (2000-2020) for qualitative studies exploring experiences of delirium or its care in specialist palliative care services. Study selection and quality appraisal were independently conducted by two reviewers.

resultsA total of 21 papers describing 16 studies were included. In quality appraisal, trustworthiness (rigour of methods used) was assessed as high (

conclusionsIncreased understanding of non-pharmacological approaches to delirium prevention and management, as well as support for clinicians and families, are important to enable patients' multi-dimensional needs to be met.

Indexed as

DeliriumHospice and Palliative Care NursingHumansPalliative CareQualitative ResearchDeliriumpalliative carequalitative researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33784915
PMCPMC8189008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.