Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33784868›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Microarthropod contributions to fitness variation in the common moss

Erin E Shortlidge, Sarah B Carey, Adam C Payton, Stuart F McDaniel, Todd N Rosenstiel, Sarah M Eppley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolution of parental care in haploid-diploid plants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Some sexual consequences of being a plant.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the mossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin E ShortlidgeDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97202-0751, USA.
Sarah B CareyDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.
Adam C PaytonDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.
Stuart F McDanielDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, PO Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611-8525, USA.
Todd N RosenstielDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97202-0751, USA.
Sarah M EppleyDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97202-0751, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of sustained plant-animal interactions depends critically upon genetic variation in the fitness benefits from the interaction. Genetic analyses of such interactions are limited to a few model systems, in part because genetic variation may be absent or the interacting species may be experimentally intractable. Here, we examine the role of sperm-dispersing microarthropods in shaping reproduction and genetic variation in mosses. We established experimental mesocosms with known moss genotypes and inferred the parents of progeny from mesocosms with and without microarthropods, using a pooled sequencing approach. Moss reproductive rates increased fivefold in the presence of microarthropods, relative to control mesocosms. Furthermore, the presence of microarthropods increased the total number of reproducing moss genotypes, and changed the rank-order of fitness of male and female moss genotypes. Interestingly, the genotypes that reproduced most frequently did not produce sporophytes with the most spores, highlighting the challenge of defining fitness in mosses. These results demonstrate that microarthropods provide a fitness benefit for mosses, and highlight the potential for biotic dispersal agents to alter fitness among moss genotypes.

Indexed as

BryophytaBryopsidaAnimalsFemaleMaleReproductionbryophyteCeratodon purpureusfertilizationfitnessmating systemmicroarthropods

Identifiers

PMID33784868
PMCPMC8059975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.