Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33784513›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2021

Structure-based design of novel polyhedral protein nanomaterials.

Alena Khmelinskaia, Adam Wargacki, Neil P King

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Delay-facilitated self-assembly in compartmentalized systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rapid and automated design of two-component protein nanomaterials using ProteinMPNN.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Improving the secretion of designed protein assemblies through negative design of cryptic transmembrane domains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alena KhmelinskaiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Adam WargackiDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Neil P KingDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: neil@ipd.uw.edu.

Funding

Virus TransmissionP50AI150464 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SUNDQUIST, WESLEY I. · 2019 to 2021
$14.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI150464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizing matter at the atomic scale is a central goal of nanotechnology. Bottom-up approaches, in which molecular building blocks are programmed to assemble via supramolecular interactions, are a proven and versatile route to new and useful nanomaterials. Although a wide variety of molecules have been used as building blocks, proteins have several intrinsic features that present unique opportunities for designing nanomaterials with sophisticated functions. There has been tremendous recent progress in designing proteins to fold and assemble to highly ordered structures. Here we review the leading approaches to the design of closed polyhedral protein assemblies, highlight the importance of considering the assembly process itself, and discuss various applications and future directions for the field. We emphasize throughout the exciting opportunities presented by recent advances as well as challenges that remain.

Indexed as

NanostructuresNanotechnologyProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33784513
PMCPMC8231309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.