Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33784373›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2021

Bioinformatics tools developed to support BioCompute Objects.

Janisha A Patel, Dennis A Dean, Charles Hadley King, Nan Xiao, Soner Koc, Ekaterina Minina, Anton Golikov, Phillip Brooks, Robel Kahsay, Rahi Navelkar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janisha A PatelThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Dennis A DeanSeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Charles Hadley KingThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Nan XiaoSeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Soner KocSeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Ekaterina MininaCBER-HIVE, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Anton GolikovCBER-HIVE, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Phillip BrooksSeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Robel KahsayThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Rahi NavelkarThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Manisha RaySeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Dave RobersonSeven Bridges, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Chris ArmstrongThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Raja MazumderThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Jonathon KeeneyThe Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
George Washington University · USSeven Bridges Genomics (United States) · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

GlyGen Supplement: Develop automatic literature mining tool for extracting context specific glycan-protein data that will enhance the extent and quality of data in GlyGenU01GM125267 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MAZUMDER, RAJA, TIEMEYER, MICHAEL · 2017 to 2021
$10.2M
Integration of comprehensive cancer mutation and expression-associated data for biomarker evaluation and discoveryU01CA215010 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRICHTON, DANIEL, MAZUMDER, RAJA · 2017 to 2019
$1.3M
FDA HHS HHSF223201510129CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400008CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003INCI NIH HHS U01 CA215010NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM125267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) result in an exponential increase in the amount of data generated by sequencing experiments, an increase in the complexity of bioinformatics analysis reporting and an increase in the types of data generated. These increases in volume, diversity and complexity of the data generated and their analysis expose the necessity of a structured and standardized reporting template. BioCompute Objects (BCOs) provide the requisite support for communication of HTS data analysis that includes support for workflow, as well as data, curation, accessibility and reproducibility of communication. BCOs standardize how researchers report provenance and the established verification and validation protocols used in workflows while also being robust enough to convey content integration or curation in knowledge bases. BCOs that encapsulate tools, platforms, datasets and workflows are FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) compliant. Providing operational workflow and data information facilitates interoperability between platforms and incorporation of future dataset within an HTS analysis for use within industrial, academic and regulatory settings. Cloud-based platforms, including High-performance Integrated Virtual Environment (HIVE), Cancer Genomics Cloud (CGC) and Galaxy, support BCO generation for users. Given the 100K+ userbase between these platforms, BioCompute can be leveraged for workflow documentation. In this paper, we report the availability of platform-dependent and platform-independent BCO tools: HIVE BCO App, CGC BCO App, Galaxy BCO API Extension and BCO Portal. Community engagement was utilized to evaluate tool efficacy. We demonstrate that these tools further advance BCO creation from text editing approaches used in earlier releases of the standard. Moreover, we demonstrate that integrating BCO generation within existing analysis platforms greatly streamlines BCO creation while capturing granular workflow details. We also demonstrate that the BCO tools described in the paper provide an approach to solve the long-standing challenge of standardizing workflow descriptions that are both human and machine readable while accommodating manual and automated curation with evidence tagging. Database URL:  https://www.biocomputeobject.org/resources.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID33784373
PMCPMC8009203
OpenAlexW3146054626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.