Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33784311›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Estimating incidence of infection from diverse data sources: Zika virus in Puerto Rico, 2016.

Talia M Quandelacy, Jessica M Healy, Bradford Greening, Dania M Rodriguez, Koo-Whang Chung, Matthew J Kuehnert, Brad J Biggerstaff, Emilio Dirlikov, Luis Mier-Y-Teran-Romero, Tyler M Sharp and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Talia M QuandelacyDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4059-577X
Jessica M HealyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1149-2285
Bradford GreeningCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2727-2287
Dania M RodriguezDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-3629
Koo-Whang ChungCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Matthew J KuehnertCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-0465
Brad J BiggerstaffDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-3530
Emilio DirlikovCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-2643
Luis Mier-Y-Teran-RomeroDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-4541
Tyler M SharpDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-8257
Stephen WatermanDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.
Michael A JohanssonDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-7722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging epidemics are challenging to track. Only a subset of cases is recognized and reported, as seen with the Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic where large proportions of infection were asymptomatic. However, multiple imperfect indicators of infection provide an opportunity to estimate the underlying incidence of infection. We developed a modeling approach that integrates a generic Time-series Susceptible-Infected-Recovered epidemic model with assumptions about reporting biases in a Bayesian framework and applied it to the 2016 Zika epidemic in Puerto Rico using three indicators: suspected arboviral cases, suspected Zika-associated Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases, and blood bank data. Using this combination of surveillance data, we estimated the peak of the epidemic occurred during the week of August 15, 2016 (the 33rd week of year), and 120 to 140 (50% credible interval [CrI], 95% CrI: 97 to 170) weekly infections per 10,000 population occurred at the peak. By the end of 2016, we estimated that approximately 890,000 (95% CrI: 660,000 to 1,100,000) individuals were infected in 2016 (26%, 95% CrI: 19% to 33%, of the population infected). Utilizing multiple indicators offers the opportunity for real-time and retrospective situational awareness to support epidemic preparedness and response.

Indexed as

Zika VirusComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualEpidemicsHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalPublic Health SurveillancePuerto RicoZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID33784311
PMCPMC8034731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.