ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Orchestrating privacy-protected big data analyses of data from different resources with R and DataSHIELD.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Cohort profile: Swiss personalized health network cohort consortium.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- dsLassoCov: a federated Lasso approach incorporating covariate control.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Federated generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Co-RESPOND: a federated network of cohorts on mental health and adversity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges, solutions and recommendations for retrospective data harmonization.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Observational
- Leveraging Interoperable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for Distributed Analyses in Clinical Research: Technical Implementation Report of the HELP Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- dsOMOP: bridging OMOP CDM and DataSHIELD for secure federated analysis of standardized clinical data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Early-life growth and emotional, behavior and cognitive outcomes in childhood and adolescence in the EU child cohort network: individual participant data meta-analysis of over 109,000 individuals.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- DataSHIELD: mitigating disclosure risk in a multi-site federated analysis platform.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Integrating differential privacy into federated multi-task learning algorithms inBioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- MOLGENIS Armadillo: a lightweight server for federated analysis using DataSHIELD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Federated privacy-protected meta- and mega-omics data analysis in multi-center studies with a fully open-source analytic platform.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- DistSNE: Distributed computing and online visualization of DNA methylation-based central nervous system tumor classification.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Federated Database for Obesity Research: An IMI-SOPHIA Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Strengths and limitations of non-disclosive data analysis: a comparison of breast cancer survival classifiers using VisualSHIELD.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Unlocking the potential of big data and AI in medicine: insights from biobanking.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Accessibility of covariance information creates vulnerability in Federated Learning frameworks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Combined analysis of multiple, large datasets is a common objective in the health- and biosciences. Existing methods tend to require researchers to physically bring data together in one place or follow an analysis plan and share results. Developed over the last 10 years, the DataSHIELD platform is a collection of R packages that reduce the challenges of these methods. These include ethico-legal constraints which limit researchers' ability to physically bring data together and the analytical inflexibility associated with conventional approaches to sharing results. The key feature of DataSHIELD is that data from research studies stay on a server at each of the institutions that are responsible for the data. Each institution has control over who can access their data. The platform allows an analyst to pass commands to each server and the analyst receives results that do not disclose the individual-level data of any study participants. DataSHIELD uses Opal which is a data integration system used by epidemiological studies and developed by the OBiBa open source project in the domain of bioinformatics. However, until now the analysis of big data with DataSHIELD has been limited by the storage formats available in Opal and the analysis capabilities available in the DataSHIELD R packages. We present a new architecture ("resources") for DataSHIELD and Opal to allow large, complex datasets to be used at their original location, in their original format and with external computing facilities. We provide some real big data analysis examples in genomics and geospatial projects. For genomic data analyses, we also illustrate how to extend the resources concept to address specific big data infrastructures such as GA4GH or EGA, and make use of shell commands. Our new infrastructure will help researchers to perform data analyses in a privacy-protected way from existing data sharing initiatives or projects. To help researchers use this framework, we describe selected packages and present an online book (https://isglobal-brge.github.io/resource_bookdown).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.