Trial reportAndrology2021
Intra-cavernous injection of BOTOX
Trial report in Andrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on Administration of Botulinum Toxin in the Management of Male Sexual Dysfunctions.Andrology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Phytochemical-based nanomedicine as a promising therapeutic strategy for erectile dysfunction.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
- Urogenital dysfunction in neurological diseases.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic value of multi-modal ultrasound combined with intracavernosal injection testing for concurrent erectile dysfunction and penile curvature.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- [Erectile dysfunction-It is time to act! : Practical tips and current guideline recommendations for diagnostics and treatment of a still underestimated disease].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Intracavernosal Botulinum Toxin Injection for Erectile Dysfunction: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The effectiveness and safety of intracavernosal botulinum toxin injections in the management of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Penile shear-wave elastography predicts the outcome of botulinum neurotoxin (Botox) in the management of non-responders to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors: A pilot study.Arab journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Erectile Dysfunction: Treatments, Advances and New Therapeutic Strategies.Brain sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErectile dysfunction (ED) is a socioeconomic problem.There are several options for its management including intra-cavernosal injection (ICI).
objectiveTo compare the safety, efficacy, and durability of ICI of onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX) in different doses (50 and 100 U) against placebo (saline) in the management of vasculogenic ED non-responding to pharmacological therapy (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors or/and ICI of trimix). MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted between July 2016 and February 2019. A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of the treatment sequences: Botox 100 U group (BTX-100; 62 patients), Botox 50 U group (BTX-50; 59 patients), or placebo group (55 patients). All patients were followed up for 6 months.
resultsSignificant improvement in all parameters, that is, SHIM score & Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), Global Assessment Score (GAS), and Doppler parameters (p < 0.001) was observed in patients of BTX-100 and BTX-50 groups with maximum improvement at 3rd month of treatment. Around 40% of patients were responders and were able to engage in sexual intercourse. Patients in placebo group did not experience significant improvement (p = 0.264). It was noted that at the 2nd week and 3rd months after treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of these parameters in BTX-100 and BTX-50 groups (p > 0.05). In the 6th month, there was a statistically significant difference between the aforementioned groups in favor of BTX-100 (p < 0.01).
conclusionsOnly one-time ICI of BTX (50 U and 100 U) is effective and safe for the treatment of refractory ED. This agent has a considerable long duration of action, particularly BTX-100U seems to be more durable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.