Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33783604›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2021

The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer.

Max Schwender, Malte Bamberg, Lisa Dierig, Sebastian N Kunz, Peter Wiegand

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max SchwenderInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. max.schwender@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Malte BambergInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Lisa DierigInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Sebastian N KunzInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Peter WiegandInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first shedder test was formulated almost 20 years ago, a plethora of different test strategies has emerged. The amount of data generated so far is considerable. However, because of the limited reproducibility of its results, the reliability of the shedder concept is frequently questioned. This study provides a literature overview of applied shedder tests that capture the diversity of the concept. It is pointed out to what extent different classification criteria, workflows, and trace evaluation can impair the classification outcome. The robustness of shedder status was assessed by applying a promising approach established by Fonneløp et al. (Forensic Sci Int Genet 29:48-60, 21). Data provide similar results to those in recent studies but also ambiguous shedder classifications. The applied shedder test was adapted based on our own as well as the reviewed data. With novel classification parameters, promising results were achieved. This study reveals uncertainties and inconsistencies of the shedder concept. Recommendations for harmonization and transparency are proposed. Implementation of the recommendations may result in an increased impact on casework and transfer studies, including activity-level assessments. Furthermore, this study shows that moisturizers affect participants' shedder status as well as DNA transfer. The impact appears to remain relevant even 60 min post ointment application but depends greatly on the type of moisturizer applied.

Indexed as

TouchBody FluidsDNAEmollientsEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSkinWorkflowDNAEmollientsDNA transferEuroForMixMoisturizer applicationShedder statusShedder tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.